🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume nuclear negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had been made by go-betweens to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging course since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the US president declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations used their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Status

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if discussions restart.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Solution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to impose their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary answer to settle disputes, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more united, and more backing of the administration and the state in the face of this invasion."